Welcome to my project-based learning & inquiry classroom!
Exploring "Memes, Logical Fallacies, & Current Events" in the Classroom!
Get link
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
-
Social media has morphed into a breeding ground for misinformation and polarization. If you don't believe me, just check out the comment section of any news article. No platform has been exempt from this transformation: not Facebook, not Twitter, not YouTube. A key culprit in this culture of misinformation is the internet meme due to how quickly they can be shared person to person, and platform to platform.
Like all mediums, memes can communicate a seemingly infinite number of messages and sentiments. They can feature everything from "Grumpy Cat" jokes to logical fallacy fueled racist rhetoric. Unfortunately, not everyone sticks to "Grumpy Cat"! Too many people delve into the murky world of fallacious reasoning and malicious political commentary. As a teacher, I felt compelled to be a force for change in this arena.
My primary intention behind this project was for students to develop a keen awareness regarding logical fallacies and their various manifestations. I wanted to help students not only recognize them in others' words, but in their own arguments as well.
HOW DID I SCAFFOLD THE PROJECT?
1. Introductory Provocation: To start, I posed this question to my class: "What might the connection be between the polarization of society and social media?" I allotted students five minutes to discuss with one or two others. We then discussed the question at length. This is not some abstract question, students' live this polarization everyday. Their firsthand experiences with social media resulted in a productive discussion.
Next, I showed this short, provocative video (https://youtu.be/vGx5n_CX72M) narrated by Tristan Harris, a former Google employee and a leading figure in technological ethics. He has recently gained acclaim for his work on the Netflix documentary, The Social Dilemma.
2. Preliminary Look at Logical Fallacies: Next, we dove into logical fallacies, the philosophical content at the heart of this project. I played this video to give students a preliminary glimpse at logical fallacies in their diverse forms. I didn't expect them to hastily memorize the various varieties, but rather to get a feel for what we'd be working with!
3. Creating a political speech using logical fallacies: I've never been a proponent of rote memorization as a means to learn concepts. Instead I lean on creation. Since I began teaching Philosophy 12, I've hosted a lighthearted competition called the "Red Herring Award," as a means to have students learn the diverse forms that logical fallacies take. This competition has students break in to groups of two or three and craft a speech employing as many logical fallacies as they can.
Students' speeches must answer this question: Why should your political party run the country? I emphasize the speeches should be lighthearted and satirical. This year's winners were the Anti-Political Party and the Uneducated Party.
4. Analyzing Memes: I projected a series of memes and had students analyze them through the lens of the four questions at the heart of the project:
1. What current event is your meme commenting on?
2. Which logical fallacies does your meme employ?
3. What might the potential impact(s) of your meme spreading be?
4. What can we, as responsible social media users, do to limit that impact?
By participating in this activity, students practiced the analysis expected of them in the formal assessment.
POST-PROJECT REFLECTIONS:
Students impressed me with their completed projects.First of all, they demonstrated a proficient understanding of logical fallacies and current events. But more than that, students demonstrated impressive critical thinking in how they explained the potential impact of memes and how they, as responsible social media users, could potentially limit the spread of malicious memes and their misinformation.
Though I anchored this project to the concept of logical fallacies, This project could be adapted to a variety of content and subject areas. Just browse BC's curricular documents and make the necessary adjustments!
Every year at my school, the staff participates in a lottery. Not the Shirley Jackson variety, the other kind: the kind where everyone pitches in a few dollars and dreams a little. And, every year someone asks, "When we win big how long will you all continue teaching?" Most staff count off their scheduled years until retirement and do a little math. I'm a little different. I always reply, "I don't know how long I'd work, but I'd probably be back Monday morning." Do I teach to make a living and pay the bills? Certainly. But I teach for other reasons too. I teach because doing so brings me purpose; it's a potent antidote to my existential angst. When my colleagues and I aren't chatting about potential lottery winnings, we chat about anything and everything. Lately, we've been discussing the rise of artificial intelligence and its implications on education and every other aspect of society. Some worry a little; I worry a lot. The other day,
Many BC educators I've spoken to are intrigued by standards-based grading (SBG). They've heard of it. They like the idea of it. But, they have no idea where to start with it. The intent behind this series of blog posts is to provide those same educators with a step-by-step guide for implementing SBG into their own classrooms. I don't claim to be an expert, but I've had plenty of trial and error over the years with it. Also, my assessment, including my SBG practices, has been substantially informed and inspired by many true experts in the field, including Tom Schimmer, Katie White, Matt Townsley, Myron Dueck, Emily Rinkema, Stan Williams, and many others. I'll publish a later blog post with reading recommendations (Those folks are a great place to start though!). These past few years, I've gradually made the transition from having what Tom Schimmer would call the "standards based mindset" to having true SBG secondary ELA and Humanities classrooms. I thi
When the BC Ministry of Education released their proposed Draft K-12 Student Reporting Policy , I felt empowered. I felt reassurance that my assessment practices were on the right path. But I also felt apprehensive: to be most successful, significant assessment changes demand significant buy in from all teachers. I believe a tiered and staff-wide approach to this transition could maximize success at the individual teacher level. After all, such a vital transition demands all hands on deck. I created this tiered step-by-step plan* as a framework for implementing the K-12 Draft Student Reporting Policy at the school, department, and classroom levels. It's certainly not perfect. But I hope it can assist other educators as they jump into proficiency language practices. *By no means do I claim ownership over any of these ideas. This is merely a synthesis of practices I discovered in books, blog posts, articles, or even Tweets. I'm just a teacher who wants this transition to work. Wh
Comments
Post a Comment